Addressing members
Submitted by admin on Tue, 2010-07-06 20:39
My Gallery
The following post about addressing members should have been written a long back, however, we hope it is not too late.
We think it is best not to use regional suffixes to names, such as "ji", "avargal" or "gaaru". This is purely from a global standpoint of the site. We receive many emails every week, asking us if using the Hindi suffix "ji" is a requirement. Using the English alternatives such as; Ms/Mr, Sir or madam is a better option, should the need arise.
Comments
Lata
Tue, 2010-07-06 20:50
Permalink
However, Mohanaji, is exempt from changing his addressing style.
sjnt
Wed, 2010-07-07 11:24
Permalink
The distance becomes more if we use the regional suffixes.
jkmrao
Wed, 2010-07-07 12:26
Permalink
Adding the tail jI to a name is understood all over India. Even in Tamilnadu, nobody addresses people like rAjAjI by his full name. Of course, it is another matter that everybody who is somebody in Tamilnadu has an honorific title
Actually the addition of jI goes well with men as well as women. Even after being here for more than 30 years, I still am not completely comfortable when a five year old addresses an aged person by his or her first name. In a similar manner I am not comfortable with somebody addressing me as sir also. Addressing by first name always does not translate as friendship or good relations. Even if the boss and the employee call each other by the first name, still everybody knows who the boss is and what (s)he can do! It is only a culture. In fact Mr and Ms are too formal. Looks as if one is attending an interview
Of course in India with different languages and different cultures, forms of addresses are also different. I know from literary sources that the telugu suffix gAru is at least four to five hundred years old. I'll go by what others want. It will be a few days of adjustment initially, though.
Regards! - mOhana
Lata
Wed, 2010-07-07 15:51
Permalink
I agree with most of your thoughts here, Mohanaji. I think what we meant by this post is that it would be better if we all stick to our own original style of addressing/communicating. By that I meant to say that you need not change anything about how you go about addessing anyone. I think addressing with the suffix "ji" has been your style from the beginning, and we don't see anything wrong with that.
On the other hand, there are many members here, who didn't start off that way. They adopted this later on, or rather feel they should adopt the style of using "ji".
If someone feels uncomfortable going on a first name basis, maybe they can use Mr/Ms or Mrs...
I tend to use the formal way only when I'm talking to them (or introducing someone to the others in the site) for the first time.
judelined
Thu, 2010-07-08 03:41
Permalink
In my opinion I think I am given a name so that it is used and i feel happy when people address me by my name. So dear ikolam friends please take this as an official announcement and feel free to call me Judy without any prefix of suffix
rajamma_2
Thu, 2010-07-08 20:02
Permalink
Me too like to be called 'rajam' by everyone irrespective of their age. But I add 'ji' sometimes till they become familiar in the "comment" colomn.( mohana'ji' is exception....... island puzzle yet to be solved?))
rajamma
jkmrao
Fri, 2010-07-09 07:16
Permalink
Thanks for the reminder rAjammAjI
Very few seem to have seen that rangOli http://www.ikolam.com/node/13609?p=1930
Regards! - mOhana
Sumathi.v
Sat, 2010-07-24 07:54
Permalink
I feel we can all be informal in addressing others
Dr.Rekha Shetty
Wed, 2011-02-16 00:48
Permalink
Lata done I will be comfortable with the first name only, though I used to put ji or sir routinely.Only the problem how t address Rao sir?